MedVertical
Open menu

Use cases

Validation Reports

Share which resources were checked, what was found and which validation inputs were used when handing a delivery to another team.

Keep the result and its scope together at handover

The receiving team needs to see what was checked, which inputs were used and what remains unresolved.

Completed run

The checked scope, validation inputs and findings.

Recorded report

The result, comparison context and remaining limits.

Receiving team

Reviews the recorded evidence before acceptance.

Hand over a validation result the receiving team can review.

  1. Start with the completed check

    Run 2456 checked twelve synthetic Patients after the source correction. Its recorded scope identifies the source, selected resource type and sample limit behind the result.

    After the source mapping is corrected outside Records, a completed new run checks the same twelve Patients.
  2. Keep the comparison behind the result

    The comparison with run 2453 shows two resolved findings and no new findings under the same recorded validation basis. Keep that context with the handover.

    A computed comparison under the same immutable validation basis reports two resolved findings and no new findings.
  3. Give the receiving team the result and its scope

    The report records which resources were checked, the findings, the validation basis and remaining limits. A reviewer can see what the completed check establishes before accepting the handover.

    The resulting report retains the corrected run, recorded scope and validation basis.

This report records checks on twelve synthetic Patients, including 24 remaining information occurrences. It documents the measured result; it does not certify the system or the clinical correctness of the data.

Design the evidence around the review question.

Bring the handover, submission, or audit decision the artifact must support.